akirlu: (Default)
Craigslist subject line says: "Free Pet Rooster, To Approved Home Only." Yeah, I don't even have to click through. This is some softhearted idiot who decided to raise laying chickens and found they or their neighbors can't cope with the noise of a rooster around. And they're We Must Not Hurt The Cute An' Fluffy Animals vegetarians who can't bear the thought of slaughtering their own birds. Or anyone else doing it either. So now they're looking for someone stupid enough or wealthy enough to be willing to do what they themselves are not -- keep a noisy, unproductive bird fed and healthy for years to come out of a sheer love of animals. Not. Gonna. Happen. The Happy Retirement Home for Unwanted Roosters is the fricassee pot. And even if they actually manage to find a sucker this time, it only pushes the problem off a few years. Hens can live a good long while after they stop laying, certainly long enough that keeping them in feed makes the ultimate cost of the eggs they laid during their productive years prohibitively high.

People, if you are not willing to kill a chicken, don't keep chickens in the first place.
akirlu: (Default)
Consider the possibility that if some one tells you your choice of words makes it hard for some people to hear your message, this may not be a request to shut up, it might just be a request to find better words. If you can't bear to have people ask you to rephrase, perhaps the problem does not lie in them.
akirlu: (Default)
Shut up, and lie back down, I'm not done kicking you for things other people did to me.
akirlu: (Default)
Seahawk Heresies 2

Indeed the world is full of wonders, and horrors, and I try to take note when I stumble across one. I've got several rattling and rolling around my head like marbles now, so I reckon it's time to share them out to make room for more.

First, a horror. I thought it was fine when my buddy Jenn got Seahawks logos put on her most recent manicure. That's cute, in a my-house-has-wheels sort of way (sorry, Jenn!). But a trip to the West Hill Fred Meyer revealed that those people have no business being given a free hand with blue and green food coloring in the pursuit of game-day snack sales. Yes, folks, those are bright Seahawks Green-and-Blue deviled eggs. You can pretty much feel the cancer cells forming just looking at those dyes, can't you? A finer waste of a chicken's fertility, I have yet to see.

On a more positive note, I have discovered that I can make hot buttered rum or hot toddy with Hal's new Keurig. Hal had been hankering for a Keurig pod system hot beverage machine for a couple of years now, ever since his previous employer got one at work, so this year Santa and I got him one for Christmas. I wasn't expecting to have much use for it, myself, not being a super big coffee drinker, but it turns out that you can run the machine without a pod in it to get a really quick cup of hot water, which means that with a batch of rum batter, some bourbon, and a cinnamon stick on hand, I can get a hot buttered bourbon as easily as a cup of coffee. And while I've been recovering from this nasty upper respiratory grunge the past couple of weeks, I have found the ability to have a hot toddy at more-or-less any time has been a real boon.

Hot Toddy Recipe

1 T honey
2 lemon wedges
1 jigger cheapass bourbon
4 ounces steaming hot water
1 cinnamon stick

In a glass mug, squeeze in the juice of your lemon wedges, add honey, bourbon, and cinnamon stick, and drop in the spent lemon rinds if you wanna. Add hot water and stir until blended. Enjoy. This is surprisingly tasty for such a simple thing, and the heat, the lemon, the honey, and the booze are all sovereign for making sore throat and cough feel a lot better. If you haven't got lemons, half a small lime works great too, as does half a mandarin orange. I imagine a small quantity of almost any acidic juice would work well.

And a while back I was having breakfast at the local greasy spoon with Hal and watching the silent Northwest News channel because it's the sort of greasy spoon that has an obligatory television set and I happened to be the one sitting facing the tube, and there was a commercial for some sort of special bag for microwaving baked potatoes in, and in the way of television commercial demos for dubious products, there were a bunch of other things this special bag was supposedly good for, including reviving hardened bread -- just slip it in the bag and microwave for a few seconds and it comes out magically restored. Well, while home sick and wanting something to eat I discovered that all the bits of baguette in the house were rock-like, and since I was feeling too crappy to go to the store for more bread, I thought I'd try microwaving the bread briefly just in its own little paper bag sleeve. Yep, this works fine. No need to add water, just zap the bread for 15 seconds or so, and magic, it's back to being soft if somewhat more chewy.

And last, but certainly not least, and perhaps equally chewy, I have long been experiencing various forms of discontent with the way the term "privilege" gets applied these days and Will Shetterly has a marvelous piece that distills a number of those discontents with remarkable clarity. Privilege is not just the absence of oppression, it isn't privilege if the majority of the population has it. Privilege is something that is experienced by a tiny minority, as a direct result of power and wealth. If you want to talk about how people who aren't oppressed don't always notice the way other people are oppressed, find a different word. But by all means go read Will's piece, and by all means also his take on recent discussions of author "privilege" versus the privileges of fanfic authors, which was how I tumbled on Will's earlier piece.
akirlu: (Default)
The English people must be tougher than they look, outwardly, since what Americans call a slash, to them is the merest stroke.
akirlu: (Default)
The Polling Point people are running essay contests through the election, requesting opinion-driven essays (blog posts, really) and videos on various issues. The current one is on the prompt, "If you could speak directly to Obama and Romney, what would you tell them they had to do to secure your vote?" What follows is my take -- it's a short version of something I've been meaning to write as a letter-to-the editor for a while now:

In the coming election the candidate who first appoints Paul Krugman to his economic policy team gets my vote. As the American economy has cratered, then struggled vainly towards recovery, Professor Krugman has been there first, telling us how it would go, and why. And he’s been right. He has been doing this since before the housing bubble burst. His was the lone voice in the wilderness telling us there even was a housing bubble, back when all the Wise Old Men of Washington and Wall Street pooh-poohed the idea, certain that unregulated financial speculation could keep expanding forever. Alan Greenspan has since recanted. Washington politicians should follow his example.

The country needs a sound economy before any other political agenda can be pursued successfully. So the President and Congress’ first job is to fix the economy. And to fix the economy they need to stop taking bad economic advice, and listen to someone who actually knows what he’s talking about. You don’t fix the economy with government belt tightening or grim austerity measures. “Austerity” is just another word for cutting yet more vital jobs. People have to have jobs in order to make money in order to spend it to buy the things private industry wants to sell. You don’t fix the economy by focusing on retiring debt. Debt can only be retired from profits, which means you have to make more money than you spend before you can pay down the debt. Government can only make more money than it spends when the economy is already robust, so that tax income on individual and corporate earnings is also high. In other words, to get the economy going again, the Federal government needs to spend money on targeted job growth, especially in emergency services, infrastructure, and education. Yes, that will increase the national debt in the short term. But any good businessman knows that sometimes you have to take on debt in order to increase your capacity and expand your business. Once you expand, and your income grows, you retire the debt again.

And before any blowhard parrots the lie that government never created jobs, remember that anyone who believes that does not belong in Congress, or the White House – because anyone who believes that obviously doesn’t take the very real job of running the country seriously.
akirlu: (Default)
Pretty much how my writing brain works: I have a major revelation. About the metaphysics of vampires. And how they relate to demons, angels, and gods. And how all of this is just an instantiation of Thomist metaphysics, and accounts for the problem of vampire souls and disappearing gods in my story.

Inevitably, this occurs in a location where I am totally out of contact with the means to write stuff down as I think of it. Sometimes I'm in the shower. Sometimes I'm on an elevator. Or a very bumpy bus ride. This time, I was on the toilet. Okay, I guess there was paper. But no.

I would start carrying pen and paper everywhere I go, but my fear is, then I would stop having ideas altogether.
akirlu: (Default)
A theoretical framework that supports conclusions I agree with is a sound theoretical framework. ("Sound" here in the technical sense -- i.e. incorporates a logically valid argument, and is based on true premises.)

Someone who argues with the argument I'm using to reach my conclusion doesn't understand my argument, or is emotionally hostile to my position.

Someone who disproves an invalid argument for my conclusion disagrees with my conclusion.

Someone who questions the truth of my premises doesn't understand them.

All of my premises are true and correct.

* * *

These things may not be true in all sorts of circumstances. How their potential untruth in the Great Titty Button Flap is left as an exercise for the (probably mythical) careful reader.
akirlu: (Default)
Eventually I will stop being All Obama All the Time. But not yet.

Mark Schmitt considers Obama's speech, and his religion, as an expression of his core identity as a communitarian.

I hadn't explcitly seen Obama this way before. But for me, a core piece of the appeal of Obama's candidacy is that identity as a builder of community. I have a sort of instinctive tropism for his persistent appeals to community and unity as basis for political change.

Practically all my life, certainly since the time I was first taken out of the home town where I had my first childhood friends, and my extended family, I have been fumbling after community. Long before I had the words for it, long before the concept was fully formed, I was reaching for the sense of people who belonged to me, and belonged to each other. Not only was I yearning for the sense of being part of that buoying network of human connection, but at some really deep level I believed that communities are the basic fonts of creative foment, of political will, and intellectual progress. (Which, come to think of it, may be why I had to give up on libertarianism. It's like grammar -- sentences give words meaning; communities give individual liberties meaning, not vice versa.)

I can't claim to have done nearly so much for building community as Senator Obama, but in my own way, I may be feeling in him a kindred spirit. Rugged individualists will undoubtedly think I'm spouting nonsense at this point.

Hah!

Feb. 4th, 2007 06:47 pm
akirlu: (Default)
And furthermore, Hah! I say. This is the sound of Ulrika having finished the triple-looped moss-covered color morph necklace of doom. And so I say unto you, Hah!

I ended up having to restring the whole thing in order to have enough extra thread to do the knotting. And still I was fighting with scooting beads out of knots with tweezers and subvocalized swearing by the time I got to the end. It turns out they really mean it when they suggest untold spare yards of silk to thread on, because knots eat a surprising amount of thread. Still, the fixed-needle knotting technique sped things up enormously (thanks for the link, Marilee!). And the re-string allowed me to make some small improvements in the overall bead layout while I was about it, but really, it could be a complete three alarm conflagration and I'd still be pretty damn' happy because IT'S DONE!

Which reminds me -- don't let anyone tell you that if something feels like homework that proves you don't love it enough to make a career of it. Anything -- ANY damn thing -- be it done for money or fun or love or even orgasms can feel like homework sometimes. Don't judge your love of anything by what it feels like when you hit a chore-point. That's like judging sex by how much you like it when he puts all his weight on the arm that's trapped your hair.
akirlu: (Default)
Somebody over on the [livejournal.com profile] philosophy group wanted a case made that God's foreknowledge of all events entails a deterministic view of the universe. Here's my shot at it.

Begin at The Beginning.

God exists, and nothing else exists, yet. But infinitely many created worlds are possible.

God, being omnipotent, can create any world He likes. And, having omniscient foreknowledge, God knows the full range of events that would occur in any world He might create. So, God looks at His possible worlds, and all their possible events, and eventually picks one world -- presumably differing from its infinitely many nearest neighbors only by single events or facts -- and creates it. The created world is now the actual world, with all its actual events and choices.

That means that for any single choice in this world, there was a possible world in which the choice went differently. But God did not create the possible world in which the choice went differently, he created the actual world. So this world exists at all only because of the particular choices made in it.

Trivially, that's true of any world. The world we're in now exists because of a bunch of choices went a particular way. My surname exists as what it is, only because I married my husband, and so on. But creation with Divine foreknowledge requires a much stronger claim than that. In the ordinary way, we think of my choice to marry my husband as only affecting what possible world exists *after* I make that choice. If we presume God created one particular world out of all possible worlds based on His foreknowledge, then my choosing to marry my husband also affects what world exists *before* I made that choice, right back to the beginning of the world. If I choose to marry him, the world and its entire history back to its beginning and on to its end, exists. If not, then not. So every single choice that occurs in this world exists only because that is the choice that is made (which God chose, in advance, to actualize). No other choice could have been made, because the world in which it was different never existed. The alternative choice was left in an uncreated world, based on God's foreknowledge of that world, and that choice.

So, God has used his foreknowledge to choose every single choice that occurs in the actual world. Every single choice that occurs in the actual world was pre-chosen by God before the beginning of the world. If that isn't predetermination, I don't know what is.
akirlu: (Default)
Recently we were down at the QFC in University Village, which has a pretty passable cheese section. Hal must have passed by it to and from a visit to the Gents'. On his return, he said, "I guess if you like cheese curds that means you're a fan of Squeaky Frommage."

I rolled my eyes. "That joke will date you."

But really, one is reminded that she had to be nuts. Of all the Presidents to take a potshot at, few make less sense than Jerry Ford. I mean, the guy was only in office for two years.

March 2022

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516 171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 20th, 2025 11:42 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios