akirlu: (Default)
Spotted on Pinterest, this rather striking portrait of Sherlock Holmes created by morphing together photos of multiple actors who played the role, including Basil Rathbone, Robert Downey Jr., Benedict Cumberbatch, and Jeremy Brett. I find the fusion strangely compelling and while I think it most nearly resembles Rathbone, it keeps tantalizing me with a sort of facial familiarity that I can't quite place. Faces in dreams are often like that for me, almost-familiar, but layered or substituted in such a way that on waking I usually can't trace who the face belonged to -- although, in a rare breakthrough the other morning I was able to piece together the fact that my dreams had cast Lee Pace as Cory Doctorow. Don't ask me, I can't explain it either. But this dream-face Holmes, who is he reminding me of? Apparently a couple of the commenters on the Tumblr in question think it's Richard Armitage, but while I can see their point, I don't think that's it. Nearest I can come is the young Sean Penn crossed with some half-recollected leading man from the late 1930s.

So, does this fabulist Holmes remind you of anyone? Do you see faces clearly when you dream?
akirlu: (Default)
Seahawk Heresies 2

Indeed the world is full of wonders, and horrors, and I try to take note when I stumble across one. I've got several rattling and rolling around my head like marbles now, so I reckon it's time to share them out to make room for more.

First, a horror. I thought it was fine when my buddy Jenn got Seahawks logos put on her most recent manicure. That's cute, in a my-house-has-wheels sort of way (sorry, Jenn!). But a trip to the West Hill Fred Meyer revealed that those people have no business being given a free hand with blue and green food coloring in the pursuit of game-day snack sales. Yes, folks, those are bright Seahawks Green-and-Blue deviled eggs. You can pretty much feel the cancer cells forming just looking at those dyes, can't you? A finer waste of a chicken's fertility, I have yet to see.

On a more positive note, I have discovered that I can make hot buttered rum or hot toddy with Hal's new Keurig. Hal had been hankering for a Keurig pod system hot beverage machine for a couple of years now, ever since his previous employer got one at work, so this year Santa and I got him one for Christmas. I wasn't expecting to have much use for it, myself, not being a super big coffee drinker, but it turns out that you can run the machine without a pod in it to get a really quick cup of hot water, which means that with a batch of rum batter, some bourbon, and a cinnamon stick on hand, I can get a hot buttered bourbon as easily as a cup of coffee. And while I've been recovering from this nasty upper respiratory grunge the past couple of weeks, I have found the ability to have a hot toddy at more-or-less any time has been a real boon.

Hot Toddy Recipe

1 T honey
2 lemon wedges
1 jigger cheapass bourbon
4 ounces steaming hot water
1 cinnamon stick

In a glass mug, squeeze in the juice of your lemon wedges, add honey, bourbon, and cinnamon stick, and drop in the spent lemon rinds if you wanna. Add hot water and stir until blended. Enjoy. This is surprisingly tasty for such a simple thing, and the heat, the lemon, the honey, and the booze are all sovereign for making sore throat and cough feel a lot better. If you haven't got lemons, half a small lime works great too, as does half a mandarin orange. I imagine a small quantity of almost any acidic juice would work well.

And a while back I was having breakfast at the local greasy spoon with Hal and watching the silent Northwest News channel because it's the sort of greasy spoon that has an obligatory television set and I happened to be the one sitting facing the tube, and there was a commercial for some sort of special bag for microwaving baked potatoes in, and in the way of television commercial demos for dubious products, there were a bunch of other things this special bag was supposedly good for, including reviving hardened bread -- just slip it in the bag and microwave for a few seconds and it comes out magically restored. Well, while home sick and wanting something to eat I discovered that all the bits of baguette in the house were rock-like, and since I was feeling too crappy to go to the store for more bread, I thought I'd try microwaving the bread briefly just in its own little paper bag sleeve. Yep, this works fine. No need to add water, just zap the bread for 15 seconds or so, and magic, it's back to being soft if somewhat more chewy.

And last, but certainly not least, and perhaps equally chewy, I have long been experiencing various forms of discontent with the way the term "privilege" gets applied these days and Will Shetterly has a marvelous piece that distills a number of those discontents with remarkable clarity. Privilege is not just the absence of oppression, it isn't privilege if the majority of the population has it. Privilege is something that is experienced by a tiny minority, as a direct result of power and wealth. If you want to talk about how people who aren't oppressed don't always notice the way other people are oppressed, find a different word. But by all means go read Will's piece, and by all means also his take on recent discussions of author "privilege" versus the privileges of fanfic authors, which was how I tumbled on Will's earlier piece.
akirlu: (Default)
Previously, the main thing* I'd ever seen Zooey Deschanel in was Big Trouble, a greatly underrated comedy classic, as far as I'm concerned, and a movie of which I am thoroughly fond. In it Deschanel plays the too-cool-to-emote teenage daughter of Rene Russo and Stanley Tucci, and acquits herself perfectly well in the role. So I was a bit baffled by all the online scorn I would periodically see for her and how abidingly annoying she was. As far as I was concerned, she was far and away the less annoying Deschanel sister. Because really, I hate Bones with a deep and fiery passion.

Then last week I was surfing Netflix for something new to watch while finishing the scarf I was working on, and summoned up a couple of episodes of New Girl. Zoiks. Zounds. Dear god and all his little holy fucks, man that character is annoying. As if in response to big sister Emily Deschanel playing a smugly faux geek in Bones, in New Girl we get Zooey playing a smugly, sneeringly faux dork. It's excruciating, and awful, and yes, really, really annoying. I don't know to what degree either actress can be blamed for the obnoxiousness of the character she plays, but it's easy enough to conflate the actor with the character if you're not careful. And by golly Deschanel's New Girl character is annoying. As fuck.

(Brief review of social outcast taxonomy for those less familiar: geeks are highly intelligent under-socialized specialists, typically obsessively interested in, and more knowledgeable than anyone else in the room about, one or a few areas of some esoteric, abstruse, difficult or technical area of knowledge, especially, but not limited to, maths and sciences; nerds are highly intelligent and under-socialized generalists, possessed of ridiculously broad knowledge on a range of subjects, some technical, some not; dorks are the only averagely smart under-socialized, and while they may be obsessive about some area of interest, this will not be a technical subject, merely so far out of the mainstream and trivial-seeming that virtually no-one else cares about it, not even other social outcasts. And while geeks and nerds may have a few socially graceless, mawkish, cringe-worthy behavioral tics, for the dork, these are a manifold defining trait.)

Okay, so I probably should confess that of all the social outcast types, I am least enamored of dork protagonists. I vastly prefer geeks and nerds. I am quite the fan of Big Bang Theory, and cheered as much as anyone when we first got a nerd victory in Revenge of the Nerds. I still love Real Genius. But Napoleon Dynamite is just painful and horrifying all the way through. I enjoyed the original of The Office despite my squirmy discomfort with Ricky Gervais' character's dorky qualities, not because of them. I do make an exception for Milton in Office Space, who somehow manages to be dorky but charming, but in general I would rather not watch movies or TV shows about dorks at all, despite their overwhelming popularity. (In fact, one of our household bits of jargon is aimed specifically at the entire genre: YAMAD, Yet Another Movie About Dorks - and few things kill the likelihood of my seeing a movie faster than a trailer that gives indications of being YAMAD.) So New Girl was never going to be a show for me.

But beyond that, there's a hollow falseness about Deschanel's dork, a sort of smugly winking See-I'm-cool-but-I'm-playing-a-dork-for-the-lulz quality to the performance, that makes it outright unpleasant. Deschanel does not own the dorkitude, she holds it at arms length and so even the sad shreds of affection one might hold for a Napoleon Dynamite are lost. Not recommended.

* Other than minor, down-cast parts in things like Mumford and Almost Famous where I have no memory of her at all.
akirlu: (Default)
Overheard somewhere, someone making disparaging remarks about "the boys in Enterprise"... I don't think they were talking about a television show, its fans, or cast members. Pretty sure they didn't mean rental car agents either. And with that I realized it's a new business buzzword, one that seems to have crept into various interstitial spaces in my peripheral awareness, yet I have absolutely no idea what it's pointing at. It's something Google sells, or does, or something. Is it software? Looking at their page it looks like maybe it's aps, which they call "solutions". Wikipedia seems to think it's another word for entrepreneurship, and I've seen some claiming that it is meant to reference risk-taking in business development. Or the fact that something is business activity aimed at making profit. I thought that was what we called capitalism. So I don't know. What the hell is Enterprise, anyway? Maybe it's meant to refer to Enterprise Systems, which clearly are software. I think.

*sigh* That's me, left behind on the curb by the jargon express again.
akirlu: (Default)
I saw yesterday via Kate's post that the US Olympic Committee had gotten shirty with, of all things, the web-based knitting community, Ravelry and fired off a legal cease-and-desist mark protection notice for Ravelry's use of the term "Ravelympics" (...presumably as part of a comprehensive take-down of any entity using a name ending in -lympic, including Olympic Blvd, the Olympic Mountains, Olympic Peninsula, and of course, the great 1980 animated film, Animalympics). Kate also noted that Kay of Mason-Dixon Knitting was organizing a campaign to get Steven Colbert's attention to this matter and ask him to raise awareness of it in one of his "People Who Are Destroying America" segments. The campaign, in fine Ravelry style, is being implemented by members knitting hand-made socks for Mr. Colbert, and mailing them to him. Which is why I now know Steven Colbert's shoe size.

The internet being what it is, and knitters being what they are, especially the knitizens of Ravelry, there instantly sprang up a Ravelry discussion board to organize this campaign (I know, because I spotted it on the New Groups list today -- 355 members strong) and I see now that the top message thread on the board is titled USOC Apologizes!. Which, apparently, happened yesterday afternoon. That's fast work, knitters. Now, can we do something about the election?

(Actually, it turns out that it wasn't a very good apology, so Steven Colbert is likely to get a lot of hand-knit socks in the mail anyhow, would be my guess.)

What strikes me as particularly charming about all this is that it's a fine example of communities pulling together to get things done, but more, it's the fact that the first instinct here is to seek redress by comedy, satire, and hand-made stuff rather than, say, violence, and yet it works.
akirlu: (Default)
I can't help thinking that the dogged frequency with which cable station Retroplex is replaying Judgment at Nuremberg indicates someone in the programming department making a political point. Certainly the judicial summary at the end, as delivered by Spencer Tracy, becomes a carrilon descant of peals being rung over the collective heads of America if viewed in the light of current events. It's worth the movie, that speech. That and discovering that William Shatner was ever that young. Good lord.
akirlu: (Default)
I hereby denounce the New Eclectics as a bunch of non-serious, impure mongrel revisionists of Ulm. I do this because Movement SF is dumb, and I want no part of it. Also, I have a dire fear of briarpatches. Go forth, my minions, and make holy war on Charlie. Or, you know, not.

On the other hand, writing a type of Genre Stuff you would normally not be seen dead with is a very interesting prompt. I guess it's Guntoting Libertarians in Space for me.
akirlu: (Default)
How seriously is one supposed to be able to take a 16th C. England in which none of the women, including the very proper, very Catholic Queen Catherine, owns a single shift? Or a hood, for that matter? Many of them cannot, so it seems, even afford sleeves. As a result, we are treated to the spectacle of Tudor women routinely traipsing around the countryside, in public, with their hair, their shoulders, and even their entire arms bare for anyone to see.

This is not to excuse the men, who, in Tudor times, had an unquenchable penchant for vinyl doublets, tacky plastic jewels, and unbearably bad hats. Waugh! Honestly, I don't see how anyone is supposed to pay the least bit of attention to the supposed dramatic content with Anne Boleyn swanning about with her razor cut, sausage curled, peekaboo-parted, totally anachronistic haircut bouncing all over, and Cardinal Wolsey progressing from one spavined, polyester square cap to a worse one with every new scene. And what on Earth is Catherine of Aragon doing with a brass partrige stuck on her head? Yes, I fully recognize that Tudor headgear was eccentric- and comical-looking to the modern eye, but it doesn't follow that just any eccentric-and-comical-looking headgear will suffice to signal that These People Are Tudors, You Know.

Moreover, waving naked titties around isn't actually a substitute for story-telling. Even if you like naked titties, and indeed, who doesn't?
akirlu: (Default)
Once you say it, I guess it makes sense. In the wake of Heath Ledger's death, one Seattle LJer found all their local stores were all out of Heath bars. Kinda tells you who the Heath Ledger demographic is, eh?

March 2022

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516 171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 17th, 2025 04:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios