Hedgehog, By Request
Oct. 28th, 2006 07:07 pmSince Lucy said she wanted to see the hedgehog necklace when it was done, I've uploaded a couple of pictures to Flickr, and now I'm going to try to insert one of them into this entry. Wish me luck...!

Edit: Okay, that seems to work.
P.S. - Product photography is a bitch. I had to toss out most of my images for blurriness: inadvertent camera shake during longish exposures, as I was shooting without flash. And, truthfully, I just don't really love this Canon Powershot. Our Kodak just plain takes better pictures, but the macro-focus feature on it is broken. I'm very much looking forward to trying out the Panasonic Lumix Hal just bought, since the gyroscopic image stabilization is supposed to be able to compensate for camera shake. High tech, yo.

Edit: Okay, that seems to work.
P.S. - Product photography is a bitch. I had to toss out most of my images for blurriness: inadvertent camera shake during longish exposures, as I was shooting without flash. And, truthfully, I just don't really love this Canon Powershot. Our Kodak just plain takes better pictures, but the macro-focus feature on it is broken. I'm very much looking forward to trying out the Panasonic Lumix Hal just bought, since the gyroscopic image stabilization is supposed to be able to compensate for camera shake. High tech, yo.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-29 09:37 pm (UTC)Um, not that I'm accusing you of needing to wax your chest, of course. You Do So Know What I Mean.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-29 11:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 01:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 12:35 pm (UTC)The worry I would have closeup,(esp. handheld) is that you lose control of just what's in focus, because it's not shake that's going to ruin the picture, but back and forth (as I have had proven to me far too many times, when trying to shoot insects).
TK
p.s. I forgot to mention that it's a swell bit of jewelry.