LJ: Tits Not Necessarily Sexual
May. 30th, 2008 11:57 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Good sense prevails at last. Perhaps our Russian Overlords aren't all bad, or something.
It seems LJ has reversed itself on the "adult content" requirement for bare breasts and such. If there were any justice in the world, there would be some heads exploding among the sillier screaming meemies of the Great Boob Project Debate right about now, but that presupposes the ability to even notice a logical contradiction, let alone be bothered by it.
It seems LJ has reversed itself on the "adult content" requirement for bare breasts and such. If there were any justice in the world, there would be some heads exploding among the sillier screaming meemies of the Great Boob Project Debate right about now, but that presupposes the ability to even notice a logical contradiction, let alone be bothered by it.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-30 07:37 pm (UTC)MKK
no subject
Date: 2008-05-30 07:39 pm (UTC)Keen beans!
no subject
Date: 2008-05-30 10:24 pm (UTC)I continue to be very suspicious of Our Russian Overlords.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-30 11:07 pm (UTC)But for now, LJ is the best substitute I have for RASFF-that-was, and it allows me to keep abreast (sort-of) of the gossip of my tribe, so I am unlikely to shift unless the oppression becomes too oppressive. By and large, LJ works for me in the practical sphere, and so I am content to ignore the theoretical sphere. Arguably, it's thinking like that that eventually drove me from the teat of Libertarianism.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-31 12:58 am (UTC)