Totally Bogus, Really
Apr. 28th, 2005 11:24 amOkay, I'm sorry, but any quiz that produces a result wherein my lowest percentile score is verbal is either sampling a pool with a disproportionate percentage of Nielsen Haydens or simply rectocranially inverse.
I'm also a bit dubious about being in the 98th percentile for mathematical ability/preference, but I do have enough mathematical ability to be quite sure that my brain is not 140% mathematical. Unless they're trying to say that I've been borrowing 2/5 of someone else's brain to do math with, which, okay, that's a fair cop.
EDIT Wherein I demonstrate that I do so know how to spell Nellson-Haddon. Need I add: argh.
| Your brain: 100% interpersonal, 100% visual, 60% verbal, and 140% mathematical! |
| Congratulations on being 400% smart! Actually, on my test, everyone is. The above score breaks down what kind of thinking you most enjoy doing. A score above 100% means you use that kind of thinking more than average, and a score below 100% means you use it less. It says nothing about how good you are at any one, just how interested you are in each, relatively. A substantial difference in scores between two people means, conclusively, that they are different kinds of thinkers. Matching Summary: Each of us has different tastes. Still, I offer the following advice, which I think is obvious:
|
|
| Link: The 4-Variable IQ Test written by chriscoyne on Ok Cupid |
I'm also a bit dubious about being in the 98th percentile for mathematical ability/preference, but I do have enough mathematical ability to be quite sure that my brain is not 140% mathematical. Unless they're trying to say that I've been borrowing 2/5 of someone else's brain to do math with, which, okay, that's a fair cop.
EDIT Wherein I demonstrate that I do so know how to spell Nellson-Haddon. Need I add: argh.
