Date: 2004-11-17 11:34 am (UTC)
ext_28681: (Default)
See, I'm not convinced, given the type of problems that people have run into with borrowing from TAFF funds, that having two signatures required for bigger ticket items would necessarily fix anything. I don't think anyone every fell afoul of using TAFF funds to pay the rent. I believe you get in a hole by borrowing a little here and there, now and again, to tide you over this partiular hump, with every intention of putting it back, and that a little bit here and there just builds up into something large over time. Maybe if a second person had electronic access to the fund account, and got monthly electronic statements, they could at least keep an eye on patterns of expenditure. I think that the guarantee of scrutiny (and the requirement of having a separate account) would do at least as much good, if not more, than requiring a second signature on large checks.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

March 2022

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516 171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 1st, 2025 05:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios