Standing Down from ZOMG

[akirlu]

UPI is reporting that in fact, they never were using the metal detectors at the Dallas rally in the first place, so there never was an order to desist.

Comments

[dd-b.livejournal.com]

It's weird how a myth picks up such fine details. Contributes to believability, of course, but that suggests somebody is deliberately lying. I guess it could just be people telling a good story and improving it slightly; but truth *matters*. Stories and real things are *different*.

I would be quite shocked if the Secret Service had been deliberately subverting security on somebody they were obliged to protect. And they must be quite peeved about this rumor!

[k6rfm.livejournal.com]

Well, the UPI, like the Washington Times, is owned by the Unification Church these days so I poked around a little. I did find the Star Telegram story they were picking up - http://www.star-telegram.com/667/story/489920.html - which makes it clear magnetometers *were* being used on some people earlier. The UPI story shortened the quote.

The Star-Telegram story also mentions reports that the same procedure -- tight early screening later loosened up -- was used at other rallies. I can guess at some reasons why that makes sense (presumably the first people in will grab the good close in seats, thus are more of a risk) but it's just guessing.

[lauradi7.livejournal.com]

Oops. I was so shocked at your previous post that I wrote a (very short) email of protest to the Secret Service web site. I haven't had a reply.

More on this story

[liveavatar.livejournal.com]

You've probably already seen this on Making Light, but here's their post for those who don't.

I'm not comfortable with seeing all those indications of security starting and then stopping at multiple rallys. That bothers me.